Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Vancouver Business Journal reports: Yakima Scammers sweeten their rip-off.

Having deliberately low-balled the people of Clark County with their asinine proposal, The Yakima Scammers have come back with a counter offer.

The problem, of course, is that the people of Clark County do not want this steaming pile dumped on our collective doorstop when ultimately, it's designed entirely to enrich the Yakima Scammers at our expense.

Here's their latest attempt to swindle us:


BREAKING: Yakima Bears sweeten offer to Clark County in letter of intent

June 15, 2011
By Nicholas Shannon Kulmac

Short Season LLC, owners of the Yakima Bears, a short season Single-A minor league baseball team affiliated with the Arizona Diamondbacks, today issued an advanced draft letter of intent to Clark County outlining the potential structure of an arrangement that would lead to the construction of a multi-use facility on the Clark College campus.
Most notable in the letter of intent is an agreement by Short Season to secure private construction and the long-term financing of the facility – something that was previously undecided by the team.
“The owners realized the county wanted nothing to do with that [securing private construction and long-term financing] and so they said, ‘okay we’ll step up and cover it,’” said Ron Arp, who is working with the Bears on the proposed move.
In a press release, Short Season said the letter of intent was developed after a number of meetings between the team, the county and the college, during which each party outlined their respective positions.
“We are presenting this letter of intent as our first articulation of the project and framework to begin successful negotiations for facility development,” said Mike McMurray, president of Short Season LLC, in a press release. “It reflects the work of Clark County, Clark College and Short Season over the past 30 days since we announced our pledge to relocate our Single-A franchise to Vancouver pending creation of a multi-use facility.”
McMurray and Arp said the letter of intent was presented to Vancouver Mayor Tim Leavitt, City Manager Eric Holmes and Clark County Administrator Bill Barron, among others.
“By sharing this draft agreement, we look forward to beginning our discussions with city of Vancouver authorities, in addition to continuing the work underway with Clark County and Clark College,” said McMurray.
In addition to Short Season’s agreement to secure the long-term financing of the facility, the letter states that if Clark County decides to levy an entertainment fee, a portion of the proceeds would be deposited into a special “Facility Fund” to be used solely to support the multi-use facility. The letter also states the county will have no obligation to make payments beyond what is available in that fund.
Attached to Short Season’s draft letter of intent is a revised timeline outlining key project milestones including:
▪ The completion of facility design and specifications by July 2011
▪ A Clark County Ordinance authorizing an entertainment fee by July/August 2011
▪ Start of construction by October/November 2011
▪ Completion of construction, use agreements and opening day by June 2012
McMurray said it is possible that certain parts of the letter of intent may be refined as the process continues. He said
Unfortunately for the Swindlers, there's quite few issues they failed to address:

The people of this county do not want one nickel of public money used for this crap pile.

The people of Clark County cannot adequately state how moronically idiotic is is to waste millions on a ballpark designed to enrich a few scammers from Yakima when we can't even keep all of our fire stations open.

There is no way the municipalities of this county will agree to this swindle.

And their timeline is absurd beyond recognition... since i6t lacks a vote by the people... who would, of course slaughter this pig in it's tracks.

Other than that, they've got it covered.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

So, the rag has a print-only article about the ballpark scammers, aka the "solid ownership behind Bears" as they continue their "screw us" campaign.

Look, I get that the rag doesn't want us dragging a stick through the rhetorical entrails of the scammers behind that rip off they're promoting.

After all, the media equivalent to going through Palin's emails looking for more reasons to op[pose this rip off simply won't do.  And the LAST thing they want is for me to bitch slap them again for selling us out.

If these people were candidates for sainthood, it would make absolutely no difference.  More lies from the rag won't fix that: when they lie to us by saying on the editorial page that "...this really isn’t so much about a baseball team moving here; it’s more about building a stadium," they are once again, not telling us the truth; this puff piece in their ongoing abrogation of responsibility to this community, driven by prospective ad revenue, goes to the heart of the matter.

Earlier, I foresaw that these people would continue to pump out puff pieces that typically ignored the massive opposition to this waste of public money, and the easily predictable rag has followed that path, and will continue to do so until the hopefully last shovel of dirt has been dropped onto the scam's grave.

Imagine how much better off both the rag, and this community would be if we didn't have to put up with media sell outs and, instead, utilized true journalism.

The rag continues on their "sell them out" campaign; they just want a $20 on the dresser for a Ballpark.

The entire idea of using any public money for this House of Prostitution, aka the Ballpark, sucks.  The rags problem?

There's no way to make it UNsuck.

Just last year, this very editorial page railed against the very idea of a publicly funded ballpark for Portland.  They recognized that they would see little to no ad revenue from such an endeavor, they then recognized our precarious financial times, and rightfully concluded it was a bad idea.

"As we've editorialized before, there appears to be no way any of that money (To build a ballpark) could or even should be provided by taxpayers. That hurdle hasn't discouraged Leavitt, though. There's still a lot of interest in bringing Beavers baseball or Triple-A baseball to Clark County. Private interests are working on a financing plan, he said. To which we respond: Great! Work away! Which is a nice way of saying don't come begging to cash-strapped city or county governments."
But now, when it's the rag's ad revenue at stake?  Beg away!  Now, however, they see themselves as the lead profiters of ad revenue for this steaming crap pile, so journalistic integrity goes out the window... again.

It's this kind of irresponsibility that makes me despise the newspaper. What's driving this pap is profit... to the paper. Profit driven by prospective ad revenue. Profit made more despicable by their failure to volunteer THEMSELVES for a tax they want US to pay.

In short, the rag has become a prostitute for the baseball team/ballpark scam because THEY want US to provide THEM with profit at the end of government extortion.

When it's all said and done, no amount of lipstick on this pig changes it from a pig. We're closing fire stations, and this cancer on our society wants us to build a ballpark? Without ASKING us?

Troll $20 of ad revenue through the newspaper trailer park, and watch these immoral clowns flip on command and sell US down the river to get what THEY want.

Scum. Despicable scum.

Put this thing out of it's misery.  And do it now.  Let some other governments stick it to their people to build this crap pile... because it won't be missed.


And to any other scammers wanting us to subsidize their private enterprise, understand this:  you had better bring a huge checkbook, and be prepared to pay for ALL of it.  Otherwise, take it on down the road.

Kudos to Tom Mielke for allowing common sense to dictate his position.  That the rag wants the other two to keep kicking this dead horse is a sign of their desperation and their ongoing concern for themSELVES, instead of for the constituency.

A "thoroughly vetted" corpse is still a corpse, and Stuart and Mielke appear to want to waste time, effort, energy and money in the form of staff time to make sure this thing is throughly dead.

A rag looking out for US would recognize that and put an end to their moronic, unjustifiable support of this slow-motion, public rape.

But then, since when has this abortion of a newspaper ever done that?  They're not called the democratian for nuthin'.

Thursday, June 9, 2011

Reality is sinking in, and scam ballpark deal is in serious trouble.

Not one dime of public money should go in this complete waste of our money... and anyone in government should know that.

And now, the close scrutiny of the scam is causing it to unravel... hopefully.

Unfortunately, I don't have a great deal of confidence in governments that are as moronic as ours; the very idea they could close down a fire station and then waste millions on a ballpark for post-little league baseball was a no-brainer "no" from the getgo.

The local rag wrote it best before they were corrupted with ad revenue:

But back to luring the baseball team over to this side of the river. That would require a stadium with at least 8,000 seats, which would cost about $40 million. As we've editorialized before, there appears to be no way any of that money could or even should be provided by taxpayers. That hurdle hasn't discouraged Leavitt, though. Theres still a lot of interest in bringing Beavers baseball or Triple-A baseball to Clark County. Private interests are working on a financing plan, he said. To which we respond: Great! Work away! Which is a nice way of saying don't come begging to cash-strapped city or county governments.
Now, of course, with a foundation of situational ethics, the rag (which refuses to see THEIR product taxed in any way to support this scam) has completely flipped based on the weight of the dollar signs.

Vancouver City Councilman Jack Burkman has been leery of the scam from the start, and has been one of only two to express opposition at any level (Tom Mielke being the other.) publicly.
Councilor Jack Burkman said Thursday that the baseball proposal “plays out where I expected it to be, into our laps.”

“It’s really a simple answer for me. During our retreats, we said no new taxes without asking residents and public safety is a priority,” Burkman said.

“I do not support taking money out of the general fund for this, and I don’t support another tax on the residents.”

“In this economy, I don’t see how you could justify public financing,” Burkman said.
That's because it isn't justifiable to any but the fans of the scammers who want to force US to pay for THEIR ballpark.

But the numbers speak for themselves. And the numbers here reveal the extent of the rip off in question. And based on the responses of what had been rabid supporters, it's fairly clear that they've been hearing about their idiocy.

And now, thankfully, the bar is much, much, higher.

Greg comes to school.

Greg, who doesn't "live on his keyboard," comes by for some additional information, since his ignorance is driving him.

"They want someone playing golf to pay $5 in a tax to build their ballpark. They want someone going to a concert at the amphitheater to pay as much as $10 or more"

Still sticking with the exaggerations, eh? It's a 5% tax. Name one course in Clark County that charges $100 a round. And how many concert tickets at the amphitheater cost $200 (or more)?

And, if we had the vote, why would we "demand" one? Why pay thousands more unnecessarily?

You exaggerate because the real story doesn't support you to the extent you think it should. Otherwise, you wouldn't do it.

Greg Owens
One of the problems the ballpark scammers HAVE to address is their arrogance.  Another is their lack of information.
"They want someone playing golf to pay $5 in a tax to build their ballpark. They want someone going to a concert at the amphitheater to pay as much as $10 or more"

Still sticking with the exaggerations, eh? It's a 5% tax. Name one course in Clark County that charges $100 a round.
Will you drop your moronic support of this crap pile if I do?

Of course not.

Sigh.

But here ya go:

Royal Oaks.

Greens Fees: $80-$124


Now.  What do I win?
And how many concert tickets at the amphitheater cost $200 (or more)?
"How many?"

If it's ONE, that's ONE TOO FRICKING MANY. (And since a box there costs $1500 per concert... that's $75 that would go to that black hole of OUR money that YOU want.) I know *I* have [paid that much for a ticket.  But I will be damned if I go, or attend ANYTHING that results in the extortion of MY money for YOUR Ballpark.

Who in that ballpark is going to pay anything close to that so YOU can watch fricking BASEBALL?
And, if we had the vote, why would we "demand" one? Why pay thousands more unnecessarily?
I would cheerfully pay thousands now to avoid paying unnecessary, criminally extorted millions taken out of my fricking pocket for this trash pile YOU want so badly for US to pay for later.

Since you asked.
You exaggerate because the real story doesn't support you to the extent you think it should. Otherwise, you wouldn't do it.

Greg Owens
*I* exaggerate?  I prove you wrong... again... and *I* exaggerate?
 
Greg, you're so representative of the arrogant scum trying to hustle us into paying their bills.
 
You don't give a rat's ass how this thing is built, how many people are impacted, how many businesses are hurt or how much our services are already suffering.  Police and fire don't mean a fricking thing to you as long as you get your ballpark.
 
The fact is that the REAL story COMPLETELY supports me. 
 
And the fact is, as I have demonstrated here, once again...
 
You don't know... or care... about WTF you're talking about.
 
Screw the people.  You want your ballpark.  Nothing else matters.
 
Well, it matters to ME.  And we'll just have to see how this plays out as the rage grows at the scammers irresponsibility, ignorance and arrogance.

Owens swings by; lies and spin are the order of the day.

As one of the tanker-truck sized kool aid drinkers, it's a tough situation for those supporting the ballpark scam to be in.

On one hand, we have literally dozens of worthy programs that are lacking funding.  Police and firemen are laid off, fire stations are closed down.  Worthy local charitable organizations that have been here for decades are going wanting and closing down.

On the other hand, we have a bunch of testosterone-filled clowns who don't give a damn about any of that.  So, to get what THEY want at OUR expense, they're willing to IMPOSE a tax that will result in those supporting this scam paying the least out of all of us to get it.

They want someone playing golf to pay $5 in a tax to build their ballpark.  They want someone going to a concert at the amphitheater to pay as much as $10 or more.  They want everyone going to the Clark County Fair to pay the tax.  They want everyone going anywhere with a cover, or buying a movie ticket to pay for their ballpark. They want everyone going to the rodeo to pay the tax.

What they DON'T want to do is pay for it themselves.

One of the loudest mouths of denial on the issue belongs to a guy named Greg Owens.  Owens doesn't give a damn about this community, and he constantly throws hissy fits along with lies, distortions and spin, so he can get what he wants... at our expense.

And here is what appears to be his latest effort.  I will now apply my ginzu and shred it, like I always do, to again point out the many errors of his ways.

I'm sure he means well. Apparently, he just doesn't know any better.  So, let the schooling begin.

"And even when an entire neighborhood association votes against them."

Not exaggerating? The Shumway neighborhood is 71 square blocks. Just using a very, very conservative estimate of an average of 3 households per square block, this would mean 213 households. Maybe 10, if that, were represented at the meeting. 5%. This is the ENTIRE Shumway Neighborhood? Hardly. And, my experience as a neighborhood association officer anecdotedly[sic] tells me that the ones were there (save for the one that opposed the statement) were the ones that were already opposed to the stadium. And, a little research would have let you know that I would, indeed, welcome vote. I think the community would support the idea. As well, I have addressed your $10 surcharge. This is a community facility, with community benefits. An entertainment tax, not dependent on the stadium revenue, allows the community to use the facility cost effectively, and without further financial risk.

And lastly, where have your "thousands" been during public discussions, meetings, and events?

Exaggerations. That's all you have.

Greg Owens
10:31 AM
Lies.  That's all you have.
Not exaggerating? The Shumway neighborhood is 71 square blocks. Just using a very, very conservative estimate of an average of 3 households per square block, this would mean 213 households. Maybe 10, if that, were represented at the meeting. 5%. This is the ENTIRE Shumway Neighborhood? Hardly.
Completely irrelevant.

Greg here talks about "5%"  What's the percentage of those of us in Clark County who will have any say on this thing at all?

Less than 1/10th of 1%.

But that's OK to the ballpark scammers, because they know damned well what the outcome would be if this went to a county wide vote.

If Greg and the other scammers HAD the vote, they'd be demanding that this go on the ballot.  It's the same thing for loot rail.  Tim "The Liar" Leavitt KNOWS a loot rail vote would get crushed at the polls.  The result?  No vote.

That NO supporter has demanded a vote speaks for itself.  See Greg, it's not what you say that matters.  It's what you do that counts.  And what you're NOT doing is anything to make sure the county that is going to get stuck with the bill for this gets to vote on it first.

How Nazi of you.

And, of course, taking it a step further, the world is, of course, run by those who show up.  In this instance, you're whining about the small, but nearly unanimous turnout of the Shumway Neighborhood Association.  Oddly, one would have to presume that those in the neighborhood who support your scam were given both the opportunity to show up AND to speak out.  Yet, there apparently weren't any, save one, who took the time to do it.

So who's motivated here?  The supporters?

Or the opponents?
And, my experience as a neighborhood association officer anecdotedly[sic] tells me that the ones were there (save for the one that opposed the statement) were the ones that were already opposed to the stadium.
Which, besides being irrelevant, is meaningless.  That they're smart enough to recognize the efforts of you and the rest of the scammers to screw them and vote accordingly is the thing, you see.

That the numbers didn't go your way is the issue.  And your efforts here make you sound like you work for the Obama administration and you're trying to spin our horrific economy... the horrific economy that you and the rest of the winged monkeys have no trouble ignoring as you work so busily to stuff this tax down our throats.

We both know that if the vote went the other way, your sort would be trumpeting it like the Second Coming. 
And, a little research would have let you know that I would, indeed, welcome vote. I think the community would support the idea.
I've actually "done" a little research.  I've seen dozens of your posts that are devoted to this plan.  And where you live on a keyboard when it suits you, you've never said "I oppose this unless we get a county-wide vote"

It's not a matter of "welcome."  It's a matter of "demand."  And unlike you, I know for a fact that the people will not be wowed by a tax so you can watch a game that YOU pay practically no tax to see, while all the rest of us pick up 95% of the cost for you.

Fire stations closing.  Firemen getting laid off.  Police getting laid off.  Teachers getting laid off.

If you think the community would support this over those issues, you are truly delusional.

And your failure to demand a county wide vote for this tax as a condition for your support speaks volumes.
As well, I have addressed your $10 surcharge.
No, you haven't.  You either support the idea that those of you who want this crap pile will pay for it, or you don't.  Your excuses don't add up, and the numbers don't pencil out.

Like the rest of the arrogant putzes behind this scam, you want what you want, and you want us all to pay for it so the scammers, who are just using this as a camel's nose under the tent flap approach (What do we do when they demand MORE money?) so those sucked in by their scam, like you, won't have to.
This is a community facility, with community benefits. An entertainment tax, not dependent on the stadium revenue, allows the community to use the facility cost effectively, and without further financial risk.

So, Greg... if this is a "community facility," then why is it that those putting up 30% of the cost make all the money off it?

See, the Firstenberg Community Center is a "community facility."  No private entity makes a dime off it.

In this case, these people put up a tiny fraction of the cost; we bear all the rest, the responsibility and everything that goes with it, and they make all the money off this "community facility" which is as much a "community facility" as the Hilton Ballroom.

When private people are making all the money in profits, it's no more a "community facility" then a gas station or a grocery store.  If it were a taxpayer-paid "public facility" it would be like a park or a playground. And how much are you paying to use those?

So stop the bullshit.  Words have meaning, and using them to put lipstick on this pig doesn't change the fact that it is NOT a "community facility," because if it were, those "community benefits" wouldn't cost anyone wanting to use it... or those costs CERTAINLY wouldn't go into the owner's pockets.

The "community benefits" are limited to the scammers who've taken the ignorant in with their lies, and those with a hidden or personal agenda (Leavitt and Stuart) and those providing the concessions along with the despicable rag who'll make bank off the advertising... all without paying a nickel of the tax needed to pay for this steaming pile.

And the lies about "without further financial risk?"

People will not pay to see just-out-of-high-school baseball.  They rarely pay to watch high school ball; and when the newness wears off, they'll stop going to watch a bunch of kids who have as much chance to make it to the majors as you do to exhibit common sense.

We see that in our semi-pro basketball and football teams.

So, what happens when the revenue falls far below the projections, like when the rag blew it on theitr moronic $700,000 a year "will go to local hotels" idiocy?  Who picks up the tab for that?

And you STILL haven't explained why someone living in Amboy, for example, should be responsible for a penny of the facility because YOU want it; ESPECIALLY when we have so many other much more important needs that can actually save lives going unmet.

And lastly, where have your "thousands" been during public discussions, meetings, and events?
The fact that the rag and the downtown mafia/identity Vancouver types have the money and the media in their pockets, and got organized first with all the coverage does not mean for one second that the opposition isn't massive and overwhelming.

We're gearing up.  We'll be around.
Exaggerations. That's all you have.
I defer to your rank hypocrisy Greg.  As you're doing all you can to screw this community, I hope you're proud of yourself.

What Greg Owens, Mike Bomar and Steve Stuart DON'T care about when it comes to the Ballpark Scam.

It's difficult for me to grasp why so many people are so willing to sell out the entire county to get what they want, or why no amount of opposition makes any difference to these children.

Close down a fire station?  No problem.  let's extort millions from the people of Clark County to build a Ballpark we don't need so a few people from Yakima can come in and rip us off with the authority of the county commissioners.

Want a Ballpark?  No problem, we'll just make the rest of the county, the vast majority of who will never set foot in this rip off, totally pay for it.  That way, these clowns can enjoy the benefits of having everyone else pay for what THEY want, but damned sure don't need, and wouldn't THINK of paying for themselves.

Who gives a rat's ass that Clark College is sitting on $70 million or so and could write a check for this RIGHT NOW if it was so damned important.

That someone buying a ticket to attend a concert in the amphitheater will pay more... a LOT more... then those buying the tickets at the Ballpark doesn't bother these slime one wit.  They want what THEY want, and THEY want US to pay for what THEY want, like the playground punks they are.

And even when an entire neighborhood association votes against them... even when the vast majority of the comments on the newspaper puff pieces the rag keeps cranking out, though they won't be paying a nickel in taxes for this scam that they'll be making bank off of in advertising and that they have flipped over because they're being paid off... none of that makes any difference to the people who care so little about this community because, well, they want what they want, and screw the rest of us.

Greg Owens, who is one of THE biggest kool aid drinkers, ready to bend us over at a moments notice so he can watch semi-pro, barely-post amateur baseball, left this comment in response to my post concerning the baseball thugs publicly flogging anyone who opposes them generally, and the paper's punks going after those actively working to stop this crime from happening:  Now that Shumway has condemned the moronic ballpark scam, can we expect the slimeballs running the rag to fire back?  Anonymous



Anonymous said...  



"The meeting was attended by approximately 15 neighbors"

Meaning, possibly only as many as 10 households. Not even close to a majority of the households in the neighborhood, and hardly representative of the "thousands" you claim are against the stadium. I have yet to witness anywhere near a majority of citizens against this project at any event or discussion concerning the stadium. I get that you are against the project, and I also get that many are. But the exaggerations about the opposition are not helping your cause.

Greg Owens 11:05 AM

And the exaggerations about the non-existent benefits help yours?

I have asked you, personally, Greg, a dozen times: will you agree to pay a $10 surcharge on every ticket to pay for this ballpark to leave us out of this?  And a dozen times you've failed to answer... which is, in and of itself, an answer: you want this, but you want all of US to pay for it.

I'm not exaggerating, and you damned will know I'm not.  You  and the rest of the community bullies would unhesitatingly put this to a vote... you know... like they do in Yakima?  if you HAD the votes... but the last thing you, or Stuart... or Bomar want is first, to let us have a voice at the polls on this and second, pay for this fricking thing yourself.

Priorities, Greg... Steve... Mike.  You people don't have any.  And that is, frankly, disgusting.